Gynecological hysteroscopy (cold knife)

Quantity:

Sales: 786

SKU:{{ product.sku }}

Model: {{ product.model }}

weight: {{ product.weight }} Kilogram

Product Details

Hysteroscopic Cold Knife vs. Traditional Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Resection Comparison Table

Comparison Item

Hysteroscopic Cold Knife System

Traditional Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Resection

Working Principle

Pure mechanical manipulation (scissors, forceps, cold knife), no energy input or heat generation.

Uses thermal effect generated by high-frequency electric energy for tissue cutting and coagulation.

Tissue Injury

No thermal injury; excellent protection of the endometrium, with low risk of postoperative adhesions.

Thermal burns may occur, which can damage the basal layer of the endometrium and increase the risk of adhesions.

Surgical Precision

Extremely high; capable of fine adhesion separation and resection of small polyps.

High, but heat conduction may cause tissue carbonization, affecting pathological judgment.

Applicable Scenarios

Intrauterine adhesion separation, uterine septum resection, endometrial polyp resection, submucosal myomectomy, etc.

Resection of larger myomas, surgeries requiring high hemostasis requirements.

Complication Risk

Low, mainly mechanical injury.

Relatively high, including uterine perforation, bleeding, infection, intrauterine adhesions, etc.

Postoperative Recovery

Fast, short hospital stay, mild pain.

Relatively slow; postoperative discharge and abdominal pain may occur.

Pathological Specimen Quality

Good, intact tissue, conducive to pathological diagnosis.

Average; tissue carbonization may affect pathological results.

Profile Picture

Upload a JPG or PNG image. 300 x 300 is recommended.

Only jpg/jpeg/png/mp4/mov files can be uploaded, and it should not exceed 50M

Submit

Cancel

Add Reviews

Reply:

To find out more about our products and solutions, please fill out the form below and one of our experts will get back to you shortly.

CONTACT US